On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:33:50 +0400, Alex Kapranoff <kappa_at_rambler-co.ru> wrote: > * Mike Makonnen <mtm_at_identd.net> [July 27 2004, 11:42]: > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:00:53PM -0400, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > > > How does this apply to beasts such as postfix which recommends: > > > > > > cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > > ln -s /usr/local/sbin/postfix postfix.sh > > > > That depends. If sbin/postfix is an old-style script then nothing will > > have changed. It gets sourced same as before. If it's an rc.d script then > > it will probably have to be patched to conform to rc.d style. > > % file =postfix > /usr/local/sbin/postfix: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), for FreeBSD 5.0.2, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped > Since the program postfix is not a shell script the recommendation is to create a rcNG shell script to start and stop postfix, instead of creating a link to the executeable. This way you could pass flags to postfix by defining postfix_flags in /etc/rc.conf, /etc/rc.conf.local, or /etc/rc.conf.d/postfix. ScotReceived on Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:49:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:03 UTC