On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:19:19AM +0000, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:20:21PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > > Hi, Alexander! > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:18:20AM +0000, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > > > I am going to do an import of GCC 3.4.x snapshot in approximately > > > 24 hours. At this time I would like to request anyone planning any > > > sweeping changes in the tree to pospone them until new GCC is in. > > > The snapshot will be followed by GCC 3.4.2 release when it is available. > > > > Do you plan to enable HANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP feature? > > > > /fjoe > Is was too late in the game for me to enable it in this snapshot. I will > consider doing that in the next GCC update. I do not recall anyone ever > mentioning this feature to me before, let alone aking me to enable it. Actually, I did, in private mails to both you and obrien_at_ few days ago. I encountered this problem when porting CPP code to FreeBSD recently. #pragma pack (push/pop) feature is enabled with some major Linux distributed gcc (Fedora Core is one of them), which increases chances that we'd have to do something about it, since people tend to write software, test it under MSVC and Fedora's gcc, see it works there, and release it. Current solution of converting #pragma pack (push/pop) to mere pack(n)/pack() could lead to potential problems (read: bugs) and just isn't The Right Thing(tm). Since you asked, I also hope you (or someone else) will upgrade manual page for gcc, since it's really outdated for -CURRENT at this moment. If memory serves me right, all necessary patches are in existence, and probably were submitted to our GCC maintainers already. ./danfeReceived on Fri Jul 30 2004 - 01:55:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:03 UTC