On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 06:19:44PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote: > scripts that have a .sh, and those that don't. If you really want > your script to be sourced in the same shell, then you give it a > .sh extension. Otherwise, it will be sourced in a subshell. So, when It can make things even worse, what if someone rename his rc.subr-ed script.sh to script.sh.old ? It was common practice in the past to not execute anything without .sh at all. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Sat Jul 31 2004 - 13:33:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:04 UTC