On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:19:11AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: B> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: B> > S> allocated using this mechanism. I did it once for vlan tags but botched it B> > S> (didn't handle module references properly) so backed it. But there's no B> > S> reason someone cannot redo it or convert other heavily used fixed size tags B> > S> to use a zone. B> > B> > Have you saved your efforts? May I look at them? B> B> They are in the CVS history of sys/net/if_vlan.c. I see now, thanks. Question to Sam: have you performed any tests? Is this definitely true, that UMAllocing in special zone is faster than general malloc()? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPEReceived on Fri Jun 04 2004 - 02:27:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:55 UTC