On Monday 14 June 2004 01:14 am, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:36, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > > That's difficult for those of us who are affected by the ACPI > > > > interrupt allocation problems. If ACPI isn't going to be fixed soon > > > > (it's been 2 weeks already), then the last commits should be backed. > > > > > > It would help if you'd point out the email message with this problem > > > and what commits caused it. I'm not aware of any new interrupt > > > problems and haven't seen email about it on acpi_at_. > > > > I don't know which commit but I believe John Baldwin is working on a fix. > > > > The problem occurs between 02:30 29/05/2004 UTC and 04:00 29/05/2004 UTC. > > (ie code from the former works, code from the later doesn't) > > > > The problem exhibits itself as bfe0 watchdog timeouts (on my system > > anyway) > > Have you isolated it further? Try backing out rev 1.15 of > acpi_pci_link.c, referenced by this email (click on link for a patch): > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2053288+0+archive/2004/cvs-all >/20040530.cvs-all > > I do believe John is working on this. A temporary backout might be in > order but I'll let him decide on that. Either way, the right direction > for this stuff is to keep moving forward and this commit was definitely a > step that way. It can be backed out for now I guess. Basically, the code doesn't work at all with regards to routing virgin interrupts and this change just exposed that. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Mon Jun 14 2004 - 15:16:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:57 UTC