Re: startup error for pflogd

From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser_at_chello.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:48 +0200
# obrien_at_freebsd.org / 2004-06-21 09:46:57 -0700:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:39:10PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> > This might seem like OpenBSD/paranoia, but my opinion on it is: It's done so 
> > why not port it over? It also helps to keep the diff down (which means less 
> > work).
> > 
> > If there is no resistance against "yet another user", I will add _pflogd.
> 
> I would prefer just 'pflogd' until it is discussed if we want to follow
> the _<service> way.

    I'd prefer the underscored kind. I remember a post on ports_at_ from
    a guy called Cyrus complaining about the mail/cyrus* ports stealing
    his login. This kind of problems can be avoided, plus there's the
    benefit of easier recognition of "system" processes (daemons) from
    user ones in e. g. top(1).


-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
Received on Mon Jun 21 2004 - 17:06:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC