On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 11:23+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Maxim Konovalov <maxim_at_macomnet.ru> writes: > > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to > > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape. > > You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that > -CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2. Yesterday -CURRENT leaks kernel memory very quickly and panics after 10 - 15 mins up. Machine is 2x3GHz Xeon, 4GB RAM, ~5000 httpd/ftpd tcp sessions, 300-400Mbps output, ~50TB output in a day. The same config (kernel, sysctl's, loader tunables, hardware) works well with RELENG_5_2. -- Maxim KonovalovReceived on Tue Jun 22 2004 - 07:30:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC