Re: _<service> users [Was: startup error for pflogd]

From: Doug White <dwhite_at_gumbysoft.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Max Laier wrote:

> > I think its quite doable for 6.x; this gives ports a chance to get on
> > board without having a huge rush before 5.3 hits the street.
>
> I completely agree with you here. My question is, what should I do with
> pflogd? I don't see much point in creating user pflogd now, patching pflogd
> to use it and revert everything back for 6-current. So will it be much of a
> problem to add _pflogd now eventhough the rest of the daemons is not yet
> converted?

Well, everything else is going to have to get patched too, so pflogd will
just ride the megacommit. :-)

How many places is the username referenced in the code? I wouldn't think
it would pop up more than a couple of times.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite_at_gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org
Received on Thu Jun 24 2004 - 01:20:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC