Doug White wrote: > Well, everything else is going to have to get patched too, so pflogd will > just ride the megacommit. :-) Exactly. What's the problem in starting the new naming scheme with pflogd? If not for anything else, we'll have a potentially more secure box if pflogd runs as a different user. -- Bruno Miguel Afonso Biological Eng. student D.E.Q. _at_ I.S.T. - Portugal GnuPG Public key: http://dequim.ist.utl.pt/~bruno/gpgReceived on Thu Jun 24 2004 - 12:40:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC