Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:04:08 -0600 (MDT)
In message: <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy_at_sepulcrum.org>
            "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy_at_sepulcrum.org> writes:
: On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:31:18 +0200
: des_at_des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote:
: 
: > "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy_at_sepulcrum.org> writes:
: > > I think this should solve the problem, correct me if am wrong. =)
: > 
: > No, that just shoves it under the carpet.
: Maybe you could explain why ?

Because it just initializes the variable without understanding WHY it
is uninitialized, or what the right default value might be.

Warner
Received on Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:07:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC