"Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy_at_sepulcrum.org> writes: > des_at_des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote: > > "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy_at_sepulcrum.org> writes: > > > I think this should solve the problem, correct me if am wrong. =) > > No, that just shoves it under the carpet. > Maybe you could explain why ? Just look at the code. What the warning is really telling you is that you may be using the value of v from a previous loop iteration. Initializing v to 0 before the loop shuts up the warning, but doesn't actually stop the code from using an incorrect value of v. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.noReceived on Fri Jun 25 2004 - 17:13:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC