On Friday 25 June 2004 07:32 pm, Jon Noack wrote: > On 06/25/04 22:28, Sergio Carrillo wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:53:45PM -0800, Beecher Rintoul wrote: > >>> I have been using XFree86 for some time now, and it's time to do some > >>> upgrades. I have heard that the new X.Org might be a better choice. > >>> Does anyone have an opinion on it? With the time involved to compile > >>> on a 400 MHz box, I thought I would ask before I just dove in. > >> > >> The x.org packages don't yet build on the cluster. > > > > I'm running it, the only problem is to deal with dependencies in some > > ports (pkdb -F). I needed it to support radeon9600, but don't want to > > install the Xfree-snap server: > > For what it's worth, I used the xfree86-snap server with no problems for > several months on an ATI Radeon 9800 Pro. > > Jon Thanks for the responses, I think I'll give it a try. FWIW, I've been running XFree86-4.4 cvsupped and compiled from their tree with no problems for about a month and a half. Now I need to uninstall and install an X port properly before my ports get totally out of sync. X.Org seems to be where things are heading. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech_at_northwindcom.dyndns.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Sat Jun 26 2004 - 01:58:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC