Re: X.Org

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Beecher Rintoul wrote:

> I have been using XFree86 for some time now, and it's time to do some
> upgrades. I have heard that the new X.Org might be a better choice. Does
> anyone have an opinion on it? With the time involved to compile on a 400 MHz
> box, I thought I would ask before I just dove in.
Generally: it works on my -CURRENT machine. 
After some typing  in # pkgdb -F to fix all dependencies I could 
succesfully # portupgrade -a  with only one exception: openoffice 
(but this is problematic anyway and my old version still runs
  without any issues).
Some people reported perfomance improvements. I am not sure about 
that.

Good Luck,

Uli.
>
> TIA,
>
> Beech
> --
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech_at_northwindcom.dyndns.org
> /"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | NorthWind Communications
> \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310
> X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
> / \
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>

 	+---------------------------+
 	|    Peter Ulrich Kruppa    |
         |         Wuppertal         |
         |          Germany          |
         +---------------------------+