Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history

From: Alex Keahan <alex_at_hightemplar.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:50:38 +0300
On Saturday 26 Jun 2004 7:17 pm, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 05:43:20PM +0200, Cordula's Web wrote:
> > > > > - Numerous third-party applications for SCO and Solaris/x86
> > > > > (e.g. backup solutions)
> > > >
> > > > Maple V for Solaris/x86.
> > >
> > > Is something wrong with Maple for Linux?  (Which is up to version 9.5,
> > > looks as if.)
> >
> > No license. Gatuitously dropping backward compatibility support for
> > commercial software is rude, to say the least... Where was that old
> > Solaris/x86 HDD now?. Yuck. :-(
>
> No, it's realistic. Maintaining SVR4/i386 compatibility is not a good use
> of developer resources considering how few people use it.

What happened to "if it ain't broken, don't axe it"?

Alex
Received on Sat Jun 26 2004 - 15:01:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC