In message: <3949.1088292437_at_critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk> writes: : In message <20040626231221.GA11573_at_dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes: : >On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 12:08:36PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: : >> In message <20040626100116.GK7457_at_wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" : >> writes: : >> : >> >Has this been approved of by the core team or any other official organ : >> >of the project? : >> : >> I got a "good riddance" from re_at_ (scottl) : > : >That isn't sufficient. Please run thru the TRB or Core also. : >The two of you cannot unilaterally decide to axe large subsystems. : : Why do you think that a HEADSUP was sent to current_at_ David ? : : Presumably you belive I did that to try to sneak this decision past : your highly sentitive nose, the bulk of the committers, our most : active users, the core team, the TRB, UN peace-keeping forces, and : Lloyds Register ? Sarcasm doesn't help your case, and paints you as a 'cowboy'. : Or could it be, just by chance, that I recognized that nobody on : core (or the TRB) would have enough information to answer the very : simple question: "Is there a significant use of these bits which : we are currently unaware off ?", and therefore decided to poll a : larger audience ? Polling a larger audience is a necessary step in removing the bits. It may not be sufficient, however. One large user could veto this removal if core_at_ thought it important to keep that user happy, for example. : (If you answer this correctly David, you win a little yellow rubber : mat you can stomp on next time you get upset about somebody not : "following procedures") Actually, there are good reasons to follow those proceedures. You'll get a lot less flack from people when you do. : If somebody wants to pull the bits into a port and maintain it there : I have absolutely no problems with them doing that. I think this would be an excellent idea. Does anybody care enough to do this? I'd do it, but I have no way to test it, nor any luck in the past making it work. Also, if no one can be bothered to do it the first time, I doubt anyone would maintain it going forward. I will be happy to commit it for someone that does the footwork and says they will maintain it. WarnerReceived on Sat Jun 26 2004 - 22:14:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC