On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > IMHO it should stay as it is, because: ok. some more points while skipping through the code a second time: * could we make this strlcpy(sp->f_mntonname, "<restricted>", s.th. w/o '<' and '>' ? [] or () would make me feel better as those though special characters won't redirect anything in sh even if we should never see this. * in fhstatfs you missed a prison_enforce_statfs call * some spelling/grammer left to someone else else looks good to me; didn't check the compat code; going to see if I can build a kernel and setup some jails on a test machine to see if it works as well. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeTReceived on Sun Jun 27 2004 - 15:30:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC