At 4:54 PM +0200 2004-06-27, Divacky Roman wrote: > ntp, 4.1.0 -> 4.2.0 > Another one which cannot hurt to have up-to-date and also I dont see > reason why this shouldnt be painless (4.2.0 includes openssl - benefit) > http://ntp.org This one is a big one for me. 4.2.0 fixes a lot of outstanding problems for a lot of sites, and if we're going to have this in base, then we need to keep fairly up-to-date with it. Do we not already have a person within the FreeBSD project who is responsible for tracking NTP development and keeping the NTP code within FreeBSD in sync?!? I'm not a kernel hacker, but I'd be willing to step up to the plate to be a coordinator for this effort, if there's not already someone doing this. I'm a contributor to ntp.org, and I use FreeBSD systems, including some running 5.x. I know plenty of people who are much more knowledgeable on this subject than I am, but if there's no one doing this very important job, then I'm willing to take that on. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.Received on Sun Jun 27 2004 - 19:17:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC