> There's a small error in this pat of the summary. It is not the case > that stf interfaces are created instead of stf0 interfaces in all cases. > Here's a table showing the changes. > > Command DEV Version > ifconfig stf stf0 old > ifconfig stf0 stf0 old > ifconfig 6to4 <fail> old > ifconfig stf stf new > ifconfig stf0 stf0 new > ifconfig 6to4 6to4 new Why is there a need to break backward compatibility? Why cannot "ifconfig stf" result in "stf0" being printed and created? Does it make sense to have a device created called "stf", and if so why wasn't this required in the old implementation ?Received on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 02:37:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC