On Wednesday 30 June 2004 11:04 am, Gerrit Nagelhout wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > As per an errata that Brian pointed out, try using this patch > > perhaps. You > > can leave your isr_problem one in and hopefully the counter > > will stay at zero > > if it works. It adds some dummy reads of the local APIC to > > EOI's for IPIs. > > This patch doesn't seem to help any. My isr problem detection code > still found a problem 10 times in about 17 hours of stress testing. > I know that the HACK I added to make the system work is probably > incorrect, but what kind of side effects would you expect to see from > just calling EOI, and possibly not handling the interrupt? I think it does handle the interrupt, but that the EOI is somehow lost or ignored,or that somehow we don't send an EOI in some edge case. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 16:19:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC