John Baldwin wrote: > As per an errata that Brian pointed out, try using this patch > perhaps. You > can leave your isr_problem one in and hopefully the counter > will stay at zero > if it works. It adds some dummy reads of the local APIC to > EOI's for IPIs. > This patch doesn't seem to help any. My isr problem detection code still found a problem 10 times in about 17 hours of stress testing. I know that the HACK I added to make the system work is probably incorrect, but what kind of side effects would you expect to see from just calling EOI, and possibly not handling the interrupt? Thanks, GerritReceived on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 13:04:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC