in the intel instruction manual, the effect of STI is that interrupts are enabled *after* the next instruction. ie: sti ret ... the return is still run with interrupts disabled (if they were prior to the STI). In acpi_cpu_idle_c1, it does: sti hlt shouldn't there be a NOP in there so that interrupts are guaranteed on? We have traced down a lockup of the system with a TAP emulator, and found that three processors are in acpi_cpu_idle with bit 9 of EFLAGS clear, indicating interrupts are disabled. The fourth processor is spinning with nothing to do (since hardclock etc don't come to it). Suggestions? Am i off base on the sti/hlt? Is there another problem that i might be running into? --donReceived on Thu Jun 17 2004 - 17:32:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:57 UTC