Re: just like midi/seq was treated? (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history)

From: Mathew Kanner <mat_at_cnd.mcgill.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:37:47 -0400
On Jun 28, Paul Seniura wrote:
> 
> > In message: <40DF2607.5020409_at_mac.com>
> >             Chuck Swiger <cswiger_at_mac.com> writes:
> > Warner
> 
> Not to change the topic of this thread, but --
> I wish someone had said that a few weeks ago
> while I complained about midi/seq support being
> removed without a replacement.
> ...STILL waiting...
> ...wondering if 5.3-R is going to have it at all...
> ...and I still have _no_ idea
>    where it is being 'discussed'...

	RE: MIDI.

	The annoucement was made many months ago with no response.
Also, MIDI didn't work...  At all.  Having it in the tree was
confusing users who were trying to use it.  Also, I've posted patches
for the current MIDI work many times.  
	Per the annoucment, we are planning to import it soon but I'm
very busy with moving and other crisis in my life and Seigo has had
his own problems.
	If you have something to add to the discussion, I'm all ears
(at least during the daytime when I have internet access at work)

	--Mat
-- 
	sig machine broken
Received on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 16:34:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC