Re: NULL vs 0 vs 0L bikeshed time

From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz_at_stack.nl>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:46:41 +0100
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:39:23PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > The intent is to catch use of NULL where 0 or (0L) should be used.
> > It generates extra warnings (I promise to fix these).
> 
> This may involve fixing hundreds if not thousands of ports.

Mwah, I've been running with a similar patch for three years now and
haven't encountered any real problems...

Marc
Received on Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:46:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:45 UTC