RE: I like SCHED_4BSD

> I couldn't agree more. After doing the suggested mappings in 
> libmap.conf 
> and recompiling apps I can see a drastic difference in load times and 
> performance between ULE and 4BSD. Using ULE the load wait for firefox 
> could be anywhere from 10-30 seconds while with 4BSD it is a 
> constant 4 
> second load time. When switching between desktops it can take 
> up to 10 
> seconds to redraw the screen. This sluggishness isn't exclusive to 
> firefox, opera and openoffice are noticeably laggy under ULE 
> as well. I 
> WANT to like and use ULE but the performance just isn't there.

I am not experiencing this with firefox. It takes 2-3 seconds to load. 
I am also not experiencing issues with screen redraws. 

I am using a Feb 14th -current with _ULE. firefox-bin is linked against
libpthread. 

Old, I know, but maybe it can help narrow down a timeframe where changes
have caused problems?

-Will