At 2:19 PM -0500 2004/03/11, Mike B wrote: > I WANT to like and use ULE but the performance just isn't there. This is a transition period. 4BSD took a long time to get where it is today, and it's going to take a while to get ULE to the point where it is always better than 4BSD. But we have to make the cut-over somewhere, and we have to get people using it more widely. If we don't, then ULE will never get to the point where it could be as good as 4BSD, much less better. This is -CURRENT. Things are expected to be a little strange here, from time to time. This is just one of those things that's going to take a little while to settle down. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)Received on Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:30:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:47 UTC