On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:33:19 +0100 Søren Schmidt <sos_at_DeepCore.dk> wrote: > Now, the above is more likely an interrupt setup/routing problem of > sorts, if you get spurious interrupts *something* is yanking the > interrupt line, but ATA knows that it hasn't requested anything and > spits out the "spurious" warning. Does this also explain why I get a freezed system at boot time after alot of those warnings when I enable HT (-current as of yesterday)? > That said, the ICH5 support is written "blindfolded" as I do not have > any such HW here in the lab. So if there is a problem with ATA on those, > someone with the HW and enough kernel clue should look into it (or > someone could land the needed HW in my lab, which could also bring > support for the SW RAID on intel's)... I have the hardware and I'm willing to fix this problem. What kernel clue are we talking about? Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7Received on Sun Mar 21 2004 - 04:02:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC