Just a wild idea but could this be something to put into UPDATING? I have seen this as well (quite a few times) and it worried me at first and it seems to be a pretty common question. If not updating is there somewhere else it might belong? Jonathan Stewart Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:13:19 +0900 (JST) > Norikatsu Shigemura <nork_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > >>On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:51:34 +0900 (JST) >>Norikatsu Shigemura <nork_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> I contacted LOR when I am building OOo1.1.1RC1. >>> I don't what other information should be given. Please tell me. >> >> Oops. By stopping to build OOo(by gcc internal bug), so I >> re-build it with portupgrade -w OOo. Then I contacted new >> LOR. >> >>uname -a >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>FreeBSD nadesico.ninth-nine.com 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #51: Tue Mar 23 03:46:01 JST 2004 nork_at_nadesico.ninth-nine.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NADESICO i386 >> >>kernel option(only I think major) >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>SCHED_4BSD >>WITNESS >> >>/var/log/messages >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Mar 23 12:01:35 nadesico kernel: lock order reversal >>Mar 23 12:01:35 nadesico kernel: 1st 0xc742b318 vm object (vm object) _at_ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1313 >>Mar 23 12:01:35 nadesico kernel: 2nd 0xc089f920 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) _at_ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1803 >>Mar 23 12:01:35 nadesico kernel: 3rd 0xc10438c4 vm object (vm object) _at_ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:886 > > > This one is harmless. > > >Received on Tue Mar 23 2004 - 00:01:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC