At 12:22 PM -0800 2004/03/24, Julian Elischer wrote: > who cares? > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:01:11PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: >> > Let's get basic functionality woring on x86 and amd64 before we start >> > diverging into optimization strategies. >> >> Uh, what about basic functionalty on Sparc64 and Alpha? Well, it depends. Would things be broken for SPARC64, or would it just not have TLS (which could presumably be added later)? If things would be broken for SPARC64, then I would be very disappointed to be unable to get my Ultra 10 clones up and working in the near future. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)Received on Wed Mar 24 2004 - 12:06:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC