On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Doug White wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > As far as -current goes, mknod is not anything worth mentioning because of > > > devfs. > > > > I disagree with this assessment. mknod is still useful in -current, for > > instance in a chroot setup where you only need one or two devices. > > Like which? :-) For example, the named chroot requires both a null and random device. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protectionReceived on Fri Mar 26 2004 - 21:35:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC