Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Mar 28), Dan Nelson said: > >>Got this running an ibcs2_coff binary on today's kernel: >> >>(kgdb) where >>#6 0xc7c1dd5b in ibcs2_wait (td=0xc7ef5540, uap=0x0) >> at /usr/src/sys/i386/ibcs2/ibcs2_misc.c:164 > > > I think this is due to ibcs2_wait being left out when wait4() was > converted to giant-free (giant-allergic actually). The following seems > to fix it: > > Index: syscalls.master > =================================================================== > RCS file: /mnt/emssrv5/home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/ibcs2/syscalls.master,v > retrieving revision 1.17 > diff -u -r1.17 syscalls.master > --- syscalls.master 6 Feb 2004 20:20:07 -0000 1.17 > +++ syscalls.master 28 Mar 2004 22:00:40 -0000 > _at__at_ -37,7 +37,7 _at__at_ > 4 MNOPROTO { int write(int fd, char *buf, u_int nbytes); } > 5 STD { int ibcs2_open(char *path, int flags, int mode); } > 6 MNOPROTO { int close(int fd); } > -7 STD { int ibcs2_wait(int a1, int a2, int a3); } > +7 MSTD { int ibcs2_wait(int a1, int a2, int a3); } > 8 STD { int ibcs2_creat(char *path, int mode); } > 9 NOPROTO { int link(char *path, char *link); } > 10 STD { int ibcs2_unlink(char *path); } > > I agree that this is appropriate. However, ibcs2_wait() might need to have some proc locks sprinkled into it. It would be good to have someone like John Baldwin comment on it. ScottReceived on Sun Mar 28 2004 - 12:54:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC