On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 01:14:12AM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: +> > What would be gained from this patch is: +> > - consistency +> +> The only differences I can see between the current implementation and the +> proposed new implementation are: (a) if not all the name components are in +> the namecache, the (possibly stale) entries can be used instead of +> those obtained through readdir, and (b) getcwd() works on unionfs again +> because it compares vnode pointers instead of device/inode pairs. +> Am I missing something? It can be used in kernel code. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd_at_FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:53 UTC