http://www.cronyx.ru/~rik/aiotest.tgz http://www.cronyx.ru/~rik/asytest.tgz Roman Kurakin пишет: > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > >> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:16:27PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: >> >> *snip* >> >> >>> I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test >>> it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests >>> for you. >>> >> >> Love to. I can take a look at it this weekend. If the tests aren't >> self-explanatory, could you add a small note about what they are >> supposed to test and if not obvious, what their expected outcome is? >> >> > If you get an error or test freeze this would be bad. > The only problem that could be - "break test" should fail. > Other tests should pass. > > I doesn't use break test, so I put off to find out why this part > is broken. > > Usage: > aiotest [-spmfb] device1 device2 > Options: > -s speed test > -p parity test > -m pmodem signals test > -f flow control test > -b break test > > This test tests two ports. You need a full null-mode cable for it. > > Usage: > asytest [-b baud] [-p pattern] device... > Options: > -b # data rate, default 115200 bits/sec > -p [12] pattern, default 1 > 1 0xAA/0x55 > 2 random > > This is single port test. You need a loop for it. You may run two tests > for two connected to each other ports, but in that case I would unable > to use random pattern. On linux 2.6 serial driver test with constant > pattern works almost fine, but with random shows how it is buggy. > > rik > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > >Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 12:22:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC