On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > I will try to remove as many assumptions as possible. > thanks for the feedback. I think that in your prototype, the only assumption was in struct llentry. I would suggest defining it as something like: struct llentry { struct llentry *lle_next; struct mbuf *la_hold; uint16_t flags; /* see values in if_ether.h */ uint8_t la_preempt; uint8_t la_asked; time_t expire; struct in_addr l3_addr; uint8_t ll_addr[0]; }; Where the allocation of them uses something like 'malloc(sizeof(struct llentry) + ifp->if_addrlen)'.Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 04:10:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC