Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?

On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:05:52PM +0800, wsk wrote:
> hi,folks:
> It seems that the ttyd0 isn't the dialin line to login , and
> the cuaa0 like is both the dialin/out device!under 4.9 above
> and 5.X .but the ttyd0 work well under 4.8.
> here is my test:
> I wanna direct connected two bsd box via a null-modem cable,on
> a box ,I congfiured the ttys as follow:
> # The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc.
> ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup on secure
> ttyd1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure
> and kill -HUP 1
> on the other box , I use cu connenct the box:
> cu -l /dev/cuaa0
> connected
> and then , nothing more i could recv!
> but if I confirgure the ttys as below:
> # The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc.
> cuaa0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup on secure
> ttyd1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure
> and do it like before i do , it worked!
> why???? It's a bug???

The behavour is intentional.
Your cable doesn't supply DCD signal.
Either use a cable with DCD suport or stay with cuaa.
It's OK to use cuaa if you don't need dialout support.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
bernd_at_bwct.de                                  info_at_bwct.de