Jon Noack wrote: > On 05/25/04 03:17, Colin Percival wrote: > >At 09:07 25/05/2004, Jon Noack wrote: > >>For the last couple days I have been unable to resolve > >>anoncvs.FreeBSD.org. It appears to have disappeared even from the > >>FreeBSD DNS servers: > > > >I believe that anoncvs was recently taken offline due to security > >concerns. > > OK. > > >>The handbook still mentions anoncvs.FreeBSD.org -- what is the best > >>anonymous CVS server for someone in the US? > > > >This may be a silly question, but why do you need anoncvs? > > Well, I've made various local modifications to the source tree that are > easy to keep around with anoncvs. For example, I got mad at the output > of file(1) for recent versions of FreeBSD and created a patch for it > (see below for more info). I've written a script to reapply the patch > after every CVSup, but this script is only workable if you have a > limited number of patches. After a while (adding more patches) I got > fed up and started using anoncvs instead and let CVS do the merging. > Can you recommend a better way of doing this? I wouldn't it put it past > myself to miss the obvious here... You should simply use CVSup to get the CVS repository (just remove the tag=foo setting in your supfile) and then checkout a local CVS tree from this repo. This is how I (and AFAIK, many developers) do to maintain patches against FreeBSD. It's very convenient. Cheers, MaximeReceived on Tue May 25 2004 - 00:31:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC