Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 07:57:16PM +0900, Rob wrote: > >>I have left out bpf in the kernel config and >>all of a sudden dhclient (for DHCP) exits with an >>error message, complaining that bpf is not there? >> >>Since when (and why) is bpf needed by /sbin/dhclient? > > > bpf has always been required to run dhclient. We'd love to see that > requirement go away, but we need to modify he network stack to allow > programs to bind to an interface with a 0.0.0.0 address and no one has > done so yet. Aha. So I added bpf to my kernel config, recompiled and installed everything again. Yesterday this PC has been upgraded from 4.10 to most recent 5.3. I have in /etc/rc.conf ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" which worked jsut fine with 4.10, but seems to misserably fail with 5.3. Dhclient binds rl0 to 192.168.1.22 all the time, which seems to be a kind of default for a failing dhclient. Is something else, unusual, needed in 5.3, that is critical to dhclient? Rob.Received on Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:48:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC