Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Saturday, 6 November 2004 at 18:39:13 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > >>On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 06:03:20PM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote.. >> >>>Hello Wilko, >>> >>>Am Samstag, 6. November 2004 16:21 schrieb Wilko Bulte: >>> >>>>On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 11:26:16AM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette >>>>wrote.. >>>> >>>>>I cannot imagine to deliver/sell CDs with 5.3-RELEASE on it with a >>>>>broken gvinum RAID5 where the fix is available for (roughly) 2 >>>>>weeks now. >>>> >>>>You obviously have NO idea what it means to build releases for >>>>all the architectures etc etc. >>> >>>My apologies if I made you upset... >> >>Oh, not upset. Problem is that there are most likely lots of other >>bugs still in 5.3-R. >> >>Thing is, at some point we just need to call it a day and put the >>generated bits on the ftp-servers. Otherwise there would never >>be a RELEASE.. > > > I can appreciate that the leadup to 5.3-RELEASE has been painful, but > what's the purpose of a release which doesn't work? For a large > number of Vinum users, 5.3 will be a release to avoid. > > Greg > -- > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. Lukas and I discussed this extensively, and the decision was agreed upon. ScottReceived on Sun Nov 07 2004 - 00:02:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:21 UTC