On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:23:30PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20041112111732.GH41844_at_ip.net.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > > >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > >> It would actually give me _more_ control over make's behaviour. I could, > > > >> for example, build the tool with -j4, but run the tool with -j2. Suppose > > > >> that is a long running regression test that I don't want to occupy my > >> 4 processor machine, but I want the tool for the test to build fast. > >> > >Here's the patch that changes the -j behavior the way I want it: > > I think that patch is a bad idea. > Care to explain? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC