In message <20041112111732.GH41844_at_ip.net.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes: > >On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: >> It would actually give me _more_ control over make's behaviour. I could, > >> for example, build the tool with -j4, but run the tool with -j2. Suppose > >> that is a long running regression test that I don't want to occupy my >> 4 processor machine, but I want the tool for the test to build fast. >> >Here's the patch that changes the -j behavior the way I want it: I think that patch is a bad idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Fri Nov 12 2004 - 10:23:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC