In message <1100269107.4194c6330d578_at_netchild.homeip.net>, Alexander_at_Leidinger. net writes: >Zitat von Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>: > >> At the very least, do not commit your patch until you have managed >> to come up with at least one instance of real world data where it >> is a good idea. > >I followed the discussion so far, but I may have failed to see the obvious... > >What happens if "make -j X" runs in a situation where portupgrade gets >called (e.g. a Makefile which runs some portupgrades in parallel for >a set of ports (without overlapping in the dependency graph))? > >I assume from the discussion that the make which gets invoked by >portupgrade (without -j) will connect to the FIFO and attempt to build >some targets in parallel. Is this correct? > >If yes: we have some ports which aren't -j safe, so this would violate >POLA. That is what "make -B" is for. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Fri Nov 12 2004 - 13:55:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC