On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: PK>In message <1100269107.4194c6330d578_at_netchild.homeip.net>, Alexander_at_Leidinger. PK>net writes: PK>>Zitat von Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>: PK>> PK>>> At the very least, do not commit your patch until you have managed PK>>> to come up with at least one instance of real world data where it PK>>> is a good idea. PK>> PK>>I followed the discussion so far, but I may have failed to see the obvious... PK>> PK>>What happens if "make -j X" runs in a situation where portupgrade gets PK>>called (e.g. a Makefile which runs some portupgrades in parallel for PK>>a set of ports (without overlapping in the dependency graph))? PK>> PK>>I assume from the discussion that the make which gets invoked by PK>>portupgrade (without -j) will connect to the FIFO and attempt to build PK>>some targets in parallel. Is this correct? PK>> PK>>If yes: we have some ports which aren't -j safe, so this would violate PK>>POLA. PK> PK>That is what "make -B" is for. Or .NOTPARALLEL hartiReceived on Fri Nov 12 2004 - 14:01:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC