On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 Alexander_at_Leidinger.net wrote: > Zitat von Harti Brandt <harti_at_freebsd.org>: > >> PK>>If yes: we have some ports which aren't -j safe, so this would violate >> PK>>POLA. >> PK> >> PK>That is what "make -B" is for. >> >> Or .NOTPARALLEL > > I'm not talking about /usr/ports/category/port/Makefile, I'm talking about > /usr/ports/category/port/work/tarball_dir/**/Makefile. We don't have > control about those Makefiles. > > As much as I like a flag in the Makefile of a port which indicates > that a port can't be build with -j, we don't have this and the last time > this topic was discussed there was a strong objection to something like > this. > > So this change may break procedures which worked so far. How? If you specify -j on the port's make the -j gets passed down to all sub-makes via MAKEFLAGS and they use it. The difference is just that the overall number of jobs started is now limited by the original -j. hartiReceived on Fri Nov 12 2004 - 15:11:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC