Scott Long wrote this message on Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 14:48 -0700: > M. Warner Losh wrote: > >Our usb system supports soft interrupts, but we currently don't make > >productive use of them. The following makes interrupts fast > >interrupts and uses taskqueues to queue data to a SWI. > > > >Lemme know if it works for you. > > Taskqueues aren't good for timing-sensitive operations. Even though USB > may not be terribly sensitive, I bet you'll actually see performance > drops with things like umass with this. Could you instead just put the > real handler into a kthread and wake it up, or use a swi? If you need low latency, I made taskqueue's easier to create: TASKQUEUE_DEFINE_THREAD(kqueue); and then use: taskqueue_enqueue(taskqueue_kqueue, &kq->kq_task); of course replace kqueue w/ your own string... Check the taskqueue(9) man page for more details. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 07:01:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC