John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Scott Long wrote this message on Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 14:48 -0700: > >>M. Warner Losh wrote: >> >>>Our usb system supports soft interrupts, but we currently don't make >>>productive use of them. The following makes interrupts fast >>>interrupts and uses taskqueues to queue data to a SWI. >>> >>>Lemme know if it works for you. >> >>Taskqueues aren't good for timing-sensitive operations. Even though USB >>may not be terribly sensitive, I bet you'll actually see performance >>drops with things like umass with this. Could you instead just put the >>real handler into a kthread and wake it up, or use a swi? > > > If you need low latency, I made taskqueue's easier to create: > TASKQUEUE_DEFINE_THREAD(kqueue); > > and then use: > taskqueue_enqueue(taskqueue_kqueue, &kq->kq_task); > > of course replace kqueue w/ your own string... Check the taskqueue(9) > man page for more details. > So the only problem with TASKQUEUE_DEFINE_THREAD() is that it appears impossible at the moment to clean up the thread that this creates when the driver wants to unload. ScottReceived on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 07:04:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC