Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs"

From: Thomas E. Zander <riggs_at_rrr.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:47:05 +0100
Hi,

On Mon, 15. Nov 2004, at  7:58 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote
according to [Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs"]:

> what other patches did you apply ?

This morning just the ram patch.

> could you please get the version from HEAD (should also work just fine
> with 5-STABLE) and tell me the results (including the additional dmesg
> lines but only the sk* parts).

Of course, I'll do it tonight asap.

>  From the output I had already seen from you it seems we both have
> exactly the same chip so this is a bit strange.

Well, afair you haven't got the "watchdog timeout" messages, have you?
That's another strange difference considering our chips should be
identical.

Riggs

-- 
- "[...] I talked to the computer at great length and
-- explained my view of the Universe to it" said Marvin.
--- And what happened?" pressed Ford.
---- "It committed suicide." said Marvin.

Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 07:47:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC