On Tuesday 16 November 2004 02:39 am, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > | On Thursday 11 November 2004 05:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > |>On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Alexander_at_Leidinger.net wrote: > |>>Zitat von Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus_at_freebsd.org>: > |>>>I noticed the interrupt storm detection line in dmesg. In previous > |>>>builds, this worked, but it doesn't seem to be taking effect anymore. > |>> > |>>AFAIK the interrupt storm detection was removed (at least partially). > |> > |>s/removed/fixed so it doesn't give so many false positives/ > |> > |>(at least partially) ;-) > |> > |>Talk to jhb.. > | > | Please try this patch out and let me know if it does any better: > > Yes, this patch makes a world of difference. The interrupt storm is > still there, but the ata0 (irq 14) rate is down to 1480 per second, and > the interrupt load is only ~2%. Thanks. Can you tweak it a bit and see if it works even better if you put an #if 0 around the lines that read: + if (count > hz) { + storming = 0; + count = 0; + } else + count++; -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Tue Nov 16 2004 - 15:28:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC