In message: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA/qWWqwitlkyUSHwJEUT+bwEAAAAA_at_telia.com> "Daniel Eriksson" <daniel_k_eriksson_at_telia.com> writes: : Finally, my question. What would you recommend: : 1) Run with ACPI disabled and debug.mpsafenet=1 and hope that the mix of : giant-safe and giant-locked (em and ahc) doesn't trigger any bugs. This is : what I currently do. : 2) Run with ACPI disabled and debug.mpsafenet=0 and accept lower network : performance (it is a high-traffic server, so I'm not sure this is a valid : option). : 3) Run with ACPI enabled and debug.mpsafenet=1 and accept that em0 : interrupts "leak" to the atapci1+ ithread. This I have done in the past. I don't know if I'm to a 'recommendation' so much as a 'I'd try your normal configuration with mpsetfet=0' to see if that makes a difference in the performance that you see. WarnerReceived on Fri Nov 19 2004 - 14:49:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC