Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ?

From: Ryan Sommers <ryans_at_gamersimpact.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:41:32 -0500

Jose M Rodriguez wrote:

>My 2x250 GB HD doesn't have any problem with the 2 MB stand.
>
>  
>
My thing of it is that we're pretty much duplicating all but one binary 
in the /rescue directory. /stand doesn't ever get updated by 
installworld's to my knowledge. It's an extra 2mb of space that really 
isn't in use.

-- 
Ryan Sommers
ryans_at_gamersimpact.com

Received on Thu Oct 07 2004 - 09:41:13 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jose M Rodriguez: "Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ?"
Previous message: Chris Elsworth: "dump/mksnap_ffs & fsck failure"
In reply to: Jose M Rodriguez: "Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ?"
Next in thread: Jose M Rodriguez: "Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ?"
Reply: Jose M Rodriguez: "Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:16 UTC