Re: Packet passing performance study on exotic hardware.

From: David Gilbert <dgilbert_at_dclg.ca>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:18:11 -0400
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Tancsa <mike_at_sentex.net> writes:

Mike> At 10:08 AM 08/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Right out of the box, FreeBSD 5.3 (with polling) passed about 200
>> kpps.  net.isr.enable=1 increased that without polling to about 220

Mike> Did you have kern.polling.idle_poll at 0 or 1 ? In my tests a
Mike> few weeks ago this seemed to make a difference, but the load avg
Mike> gets messed up.  Also, HZ does seem to make a difference at
Mike> least in my tests on BETA5.

I can confirm the HZ not making a sizable difference (although I
believe it cuts polling latency under ligher load, so we used 10000 by
default and we tested 1000).

Idle_poll is default 1, I'm not positive we tested 0.  I don't think
there is much idle time here.

Dave.

-- 
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Independent Contractor.       | Two things can only be     |
|Mail:       dave_at_daveg.ca                    |  equal if and only if they |
|http://daveg.ca                              |   are precisely opposite.  |
=========================================================GLO================
Received on Fri Oct 08 2004 - 14:18:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:16 UTC