Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?

From: george 'blackass' graham <geordie250_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:13:24 +0100 (BST)
Sorry all - I am new to this 

george graham <geordie250_at_yahoo.co.uk> wrote:Me too.

Thomas Quinot wrote:* Søren Schmidt, 2004-10-19 :

> Well, if we need to go the newbus way, we need to do it completely, ie 
> get the ATA devices etc tied in that way as well.

I agree that this would be nice, but I do not see it as a prerequisite
to modularizing atapicam.

> know there has been a couble of others looking into this, so now is the 
> time to chime in if thats the case.

Where are we standing with this effort? Who is working on it currently,
and what has been implemented already?

Thomas.

-- 
Thomas.Quinot_at_Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"



---------------------------------
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"



--
proud member of www.beastforum.com - the worlds largest animal sex board
		
---------------------------------
 ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  
Received on Tue Oct 19 2004 - 15:13:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC